2
3 contracts on 2 chains · 2 routes via 
CCIP2 contracts on binance. A wrapper beside the canonical is normal; a clone reusing the ticker looks the same. The one a transfer confirmed outranks the one matched by symbol. Compare below ↓
binance
mint burn · via ccip
confirmed
2 on this chain
added
0xfed13d0c…d75c51
open
binance
mint burn
inferred
2 on this chain
0x6c76de48…e70da7same
open
ethereum
canonical · via ccip
confirmed
added
0x6c76de48…e70da7same
open
| Lane | Bridge | Evidence | Proof | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ethereum 0x6c76de48…e70da7 → binance 0xfed13d0c…d75c51 |
CCIP |
confirmed | 0xdf1a2a49…801558 | 2 mo ago |
binance 0xfed13d0c…d75c51 → ethereum 0x6c76de48…e70da7 |
CCIP |
confirmed | 0xc30ad46c…ecb43c | 2 mo ago |
Add another bridge transaction. Every transfer you paste re-checks the contracts on both ends and adds the route it proves.
ethereum → binanceskipped duplicate · 10 h#7103binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 3 h 54 min#6158binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 43 min#6042binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 1 h 6 min#5981binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 1 h 17 min#5908binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 1 h 28 min#5897binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 1 h 30 min#5777binance → ethereumskipped duplicate · 1 h 46 min| Kind | Created | State | Sent | Rechecks | Outcome | Telegram |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| resend | 2 mo ago | SENT | 2 mo ago | 0 | — | 1303 |
| multi_chain_liquid | 2 mo ago | SENT | 2 mo ago | 0 | — | 629 |