Token Dashboard
tokens
1960
contracts
6137
confirmed
5685 of 6137
chains seen
14
unmeasured
171
queued
0

SKL

SKALE
status
fully reported2/2 checked · 2 liquid · 2 reported · hot
first bridged
3 d ago
arrived via
base_bridge
contracts
4 on 2 chains
confirmed by a transfer
4 of 4
liquidity
2 of 2 chains checked · 2 liquid
checking
hot
already alerted on
base, ethereum
pins
1

Lifecycle

  1. first pin received 2026-09-03 06:06:38 UTC · 2 d ago #7174 via base_bridge
  2. token discovered 2026-09-02 03:43:57 UTC · 3 d ago 4 contracts today
  3. first liquid 2026-09-04 10:28:47 UTC · 10 h ago a chain quoted liquid
  4. first alert 2026-09-04 10:28:47 UTC · 10 h ago multi_chain_liquid, sent 10 h ago
  5. reported chains base, ethereum — 2 of 2

Where this token lives

More than one contract on base (3). That is allowed — a bridge wrapper and the canonical token are separate contracts and trade in separate pools (§3) — but it is also what a clone reusing the ticker looks like. Compare the evidence below: a contract confirmed by the bridge itself outranks one matched only by symbol.

base mint burn via base_bridge 8
0xb9caa63e09c646c1ec79acb2158d173e64a5fed3 open
liquidlast verified 10 h ago

2 of 2 sources are protocol-attested — a contract confirmed this link.

registry+3{"tx":"0x29df1ef4fb22e0b81c8fef28b5eb50fccc259c888371e400e89f25f1d96f72cb","from":"bridge_pin"}
derivation+5{"via":"remoteToken","adapter":"base_bridge"}
ethereum canonical via base_bridge 5
0x00c83aecc790e8a4453e5dd3b0b4b3680501a7a7 open
liquidlast verified 10 h ago

1 of 1 sources are protocol-attested — a contract confirmed this link.

derivation+5{"via":"remoteToken","adapter":"base_bridge","l2Chain":"base","l2Token":"0xb9caa63e09c646c1ec79acb2158d173e64a5fed3"}
base mint burn via base_bridge shadowed · not checked 5
0x91d00cf7be6f47bf9bfaaa974d80ea79a4a3bfe7 open
liquidlast verified 17 h ago

Every source here is an inference. A contract on this chain has not confirmed the link itself.

bridge_transfer+5{"tx":"0xb15cfbc0718fd086905d4cb5b21a09b2dc653883b1df338c0954a425e01e97fb","adapter":"base_bridge"}
base mint burn via base_bridge shadowed · not checked 5
0xb49a02585e2beb912027d8876dc1cdbe8f97c1a3 open
liquidlast verified 17 h ago

Every source here is an inference. A contract on this chain has not confirmed the link itself.

bridge_transfer+5{"tx":"0x2baab72088a3722bc7829a27e90d82cb235f6f2a81db2d93173b77d1622cc404","adapter":"base_bridge"}

How it moves between chains

Each chain lists the directions a transfer has actually been seen taking. Directions with no transfer behind them are folded away per card and counted in its header. Derived routes are not shown at all.

from base 1 of 1 reachable
ethereum base_bridge 0x29df1ef4… 3 d ago
from ethereum 1 of 1 reachable
base base_bridge 0x7a567952… 34 h ago

Pins behind this token

PinReceivedBridgeBridge txOutcomeDiscovery took
#7174 2 d ago base_bridgeethereum → base 0x74b4a8b4…564024 SKIPPED_DUPLICATE 3 h 59 min

Alerts

KindCreatedStateSentTelegram id
multi_chain_liquid10 h ago SENT 10 h ago741

Exclude this token if it is junk or not worth watching. Liquidity stops being checked and nothing more is searched for it; its contracts, evidence, routes and history stay, its pins are still recorded, and it can be tracked again from the Excluded page.

Every address above came from an on-chain read. The evidence trail shows which read produced it.